When I first heard about Spring Breakers I thought that it was gonna be a silly way to show just how ridiculous people can be on spring break and the type of shenanigans they can get themselves into. I knew it was going to involve a lot of hot chicks in skimpy bikinis, which of course is a great selling point (do you really expect me to say otherwise?), but expected it to have great visuals and some interesting character development. I wasn't exactly wrong, but at the same time I kind of was.
This movie centers around four best friends (don't ask me their names, I doubt anyone really remembers) who want to go on Spring Break and party like crazy. The problem is, they don't have enough money to pay for the trip, so they decided to rob a diner to fund the trip. Then hijinks ensue. That sounds like a pretty decent plot, but this movie just didn't delivered what it could, and should, have.
The major problem with this movie is that it had a story to tell that was lost in a bunch of shots of partying and tits. I don't know if that was what the director wanted or if it just got jumbled in editing, but it was pretty horrendous. At least 40 minutes (of the total 94 minute run time) was needless shots of spring breakers partying and chicks flashing the camera. While it was important to show exactly what our characters were getting themselves into, it was by no means necessary that we see so much of it. It was ridiculously redundant and boring.
------------------------------------------------
Writing: 6/10
Directing: 3/10
Acting: 7/10
Pacing: 1/10
Rewatchability: 1/10
Score: 3.6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment